128 judges from 74 countries exchange expertise on IP challenges raised by accelerating innovation.
情報源: Judges from 74 Countries Attend Second Annual WIPO Intellectual Property Judges Forum
Session 2 – Emerging issues in trademarks: Trademarks eligible for registration (11.30 – 12.30)
Eligible subject matter matter and distinctiveness: example of color per se marks
Trademarks contrary to public order or morality
Session 3 – Emerging issues in trademarks: Well-known marks and dilution (14.00 – 15.30)
Likelihood of confusion
Dilution and its defenses
Reference judgments
- General Court of the European Union [2018]: La Mafia SE SIENTA A LA MESA, Case No. T‑1/17 EU:T:2018:146
- General Court of the European Union [2018]: Fack Ju Göhte, Case No. T‑69/17 EU:T:2018:27
- Supreme Court of Lithuania [2015]: Humana People to People Baltic v the State Patent Bureau, Case No. 3K-3-240-469/2015
- High People’s Court of Beijing, China [2012]: Baidu Online Network Technology (Beijing) Co Ltd v Trademark Review and Adjudication Committee, Case No. GXZ No. 1081
- Intellectual Property High Court of Japan [2013]: Hokkaido Design Kabushiki Kaisha v Puma SE, Case No. 2012 (Gyo-Ke) 10454
- Intellectual Property High Court of Japan [2009]: Puma AG Rudolf Dassler Spor v JPO, Case No. 2008 (Gyo-Ke) 10311
- Constitutional Court of South Africa [2005]: Laugh It Off Promotions CC v South African Breweries International (Finance) BV t/a Sabmark International [2005] ZACC 7
- Federal Court of Appeal of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates [2019]: Motor Experts LLC v Sell Any Car and the Ministry of Economy, Case Nos. 224 and 229/2019
Loading
