“Buying original products has positive side effects” (inglés), 0:21
"Buying original products has positive side effects" (inglés)
スペイン特許商標庁（OEPM）vol.17 商標_動画(embedded)
日: 2022年1月8日
韓国知的財産情報システム（KIPRIS /키프리스) 商標_動画(embedded) vol. 5
韓国知的財産情報システム 動画
KIPRIS(키프리스) 궁금해결
01. 데이터제공범위(특허)_특허를 출원했는데, 키프리스에서 검색이 안돼요! ( データ提供範囲(特許)_特許を出願したが、KIPRISで検索できません！)
01. 데이터제공범위(디자인)_디자인을 검색했는데, 검색결과가 없어요! (データ提供範囲（デザイン）_デザインを検索しましたが、検索結果がありません！)
01. 데이터제공범위(상표)_상표명을 검색했는데, 검색결과가 없어요! (データ提供範囲（商標）_商品名を検索しましたが、検索結果がありません！)
カナダ知的財産研究所(ipic) 商標_動画(embedded) vol.3
カナダ知的財産研究所 動画
1.Your Profession. Our Purpose., 0:38 
Your Profession. Our Purpose.
カナダ商標制度
カナダ知的財産研究所
(ipic: Intellectual Property Institute of Canada / Institut de la propriété intellectuelle du Canada)
The Intellectual Property Institute of Canada (IPIC) is the professional association of patent agents, trademark agents and lawyers practicing in all areas of intellectual property law.
商標登録insideNews: 中国にあふれる偽「K-Food」、韓国企業が共同で訴訟へ＝韓国ネット「パクりが伝統文化？」| エキサイトニュース
偽K-Food
2022年1月3日、韓国メディア・アジア経済によると、中国で韓国食品の模造品が相次いで発売されており、韓国食品業界が共同で対応に乗り出した。韓国食品産業協会によると、三養食品、CJ第一製糖、大象、オットゥギが共同協議体を構成し、中国最大の「K-Food」模造品生産・流通会社「青島太陽草食品有限公司」などを相手取り、知的財産権（IP）訴訟を起こす考えだという。
情報源: 中国にあふれる偽「K-Food」、韓国企業が共同で訴訟へ＝韓国ネット「パクりが伝統文化？」 (2022年1月6日) – エキサイトニュース
SAMYANG BULDAK NOODLES!, 0:30
SAMYANG BULDAK NOODLES!
한국식품산업협회, 中 모조품 대응을 통한 지식재산권 수호에 나서다 한국식품산업협회(회장 이효율, 이하 ‘협회’)는 식품산업계 선도기업인 ㈜삼양식품, CJ제일제당㈜, 대상㈜, ㈜오뚜기와 함께 K-food 모조품 근절을 위한 공동협의체를 구성, 중국 최대 K-food 모조품 생산ㆍ유통기업인 청도태양초식품 등을 상대로 IP(지식재산권) 소송을 제기했다.○ 지금까지 각 개별기업이 중국 현지에서 모조품 및 위조품에 대한 행정단속을 시도한 적은 있었으나, 공동으로 상표권 등 침해소송을 진행하는 것은 이번이 첫 사례이다. 이번 소송은 효율적인 추진을 위해 특허청 및 한국지식재산보호원의 협조를 받아 진행되었다.
情報源: 한국식품산업협회
【Now新聞台】中國和南韓再爆侵權爭議，多間南韓食品首度在內地提出聯合訴訟，指青島太陽草食品等公司產品商標侵權。礙於內地採取「先登錄商標優先制」，類似官司往往敗訴而回。
商標登録insideNews: Brands Should Consider China in Metaverse Strategy Even if Beijing Takes Tough Stance | The Fashion Law
A consideration of China makes sense as companies rush to hedge their bets when it comes to the metaverse and their valuable trademarks.
To date, most Western brands have focused primarily on the U.S. and the European Union, filing for a mix of classes of goods/services to cover their largely-prospective metaverse activities, namely class 9 (“downloadable virtual goods”); 35 (“retail store services featuring virtual goods”); and 41 (“entertainment services, namely, providing on-line, non-downloadable [goods] … for use in virtual environments”). But also, 42 in some cases (“non-downloadable computer software” and “non-fungible tokens”), and in a small number of cases, 25 (including “virtual clothing” alongside the traditional physical apparel that falls in this class of goods).
Dr. Martens, for instance, filed applications in classes 9 and 35 for its name and logo with the EUIPO last month. Tommy Hilfiger has filed applications with the same trademark office for marks like Tommyverse and Tommy World in the EU in classes 9, 25, 35, 41, and 42. Cosmetics and beauty companies like L’Oreal, NYX, Maybelline, Skinceuticals, and MAC, among others, have filed applications in a number of these classes in the EUIPO. And Allbirds lodged an international application with the World Intellectual Property Office in November after filing in the U.S.
商標登録insideNews: ナイキ、メタバース時代に備え商標保護とデジタル商品開発への対応着々 – Engadget 日本版