商標登録insideNews: Trademark infringement and procedural rules 米国最高裁動向(2022.2) | SCOTUSblog 

米国最高裁動向(2022.2) 商標

This week we highlight cert petitions that ask the Supreme Court to consider, among other things, whether the holder of a U.S. trademark can win damages for trademark infringements in foreign sales, and whether the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure or Civil Procedure govern a wrongful-death case

情報源: Trademark infringement and procedural rules – SCOTUSblog

U.S. Supreme Court 米国最高裁
U.S. Supreme Court, Washington D.C.

Abitron Austria GmbH v. Hetronic International, Inc.
Roy v. Canadian Pacific Railway Company
米国商標登録出願(直接)† 手続概要と費用

商標登録insideNews: Trademark on Product Design: Are these biscuit sticks functional | Patently-O

Biscuit sticks functional issue

A potentially important product design trademark case is pending before the U.S. Supreme Court involving those chocolate covered bready-sticks. Ezaki Glico Kabushiki Kaisha v. Lotte International America Corp., Docket No. 20-1817 (Supreme Court 2021). 

情報源: Trademark on Product Design: Are these biscuit sticks functional | Patently-O

pockey chocolate

Ezaki Gliko Kabushiki Kaisha v. Lotte International America Co, No. 19-3010 (3d Cir. 2021)

続きを読む“商標登録insideNews: Trademark on Product Design: Are these biscuit sticks functional | Patently-O”

商標登録insideNews: Justices keep it clean in debate over FUCT trademark – CNNPolitics

Several members of the Supreme Court expressed skepticism Monday over the breadth of a federal law that forbids the registration for “immoral” or “scandalous” trademarks.

情報源: Justices keep it clean in debate over FUCT trademark – CNNPolitics

Is a clothing line called “FUCT” entitled to trademark protection? The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office said no. Now the Supreme Court must decide.

情報源: Supreme Court Dances Around The F-Word In Case About “FUCT” Trademark : NPR

商標登録insideNews: US Supreme Court to Decide if Trademark Protection Can be Denied to ‘Scandalous’ Brands | Valley News

trademark protection can be refused to brands that the federal government finds vulgar or lewd.The case involves a decision of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to deny trademark registration to a clothing line called FUCT.The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit struck down the century-old ban on protecting “scandalous” and “immoral” trademarks as a First Amendment violation, and the Department of Justice wants the Supreme Court to reverse the decision.

情報源: Valley News – Supreme Court to Decide if Trademark Protection Can be Denied to ‘Scandalous’ Brands