商標登録insideNews: SCOTUS To Decide Who Determines Trademark Strength: Judge or Jury? | BakerHostetler – JDSupra

US Supreme Court will decide who determines trademark strength

The U.S. Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in RiseandShine Corporation v. PepsiCo, Inc. to address a narrow but important trademark issue: whether a trademark’s inherent strength as part of a likelihood-of-confusion analysis is a question of law for judges or a question of fact, typically reserved for juries. The answer may affect how often trademark cases are resolved on summary judgment rather than proceeding to a jury trial.

Source: SCOTUS To Decide Who Determines Trademark Strength: Judge or Jury? | BakerHostetler – JDSupra

US Supreme Court will decide who determines trademark strength

続きを読む“商標登録insideNews: SCOTUS To Decide Who Determines Trademark Strength: Judge or Jury? | BakerHostetler – JDSupra”

商標登録insideNews: Supreme Court Will Not Hear Trademark Case Over Vetements Name | thefashionlaw.com

US Supreme Court denied Vetements Group petition for certiorari

US Supreme Court denied Vetements Group petition for certiorari
US Ser. 88946135
Owner: Vetements Group AG

The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear Vetements’ challenge to the refusal of its name to be registered as a U.S. trademark, leaving intact a line of decisions that treat foreign-language marks through the lens of direct translation.

情報源: Supreme Court Will Not Hear Trademark Case Over Name

米連邦最高裁が Vetements の連邦商標登録を最終否認 上告不受理 2026年1月12日(月)、米連邦最高裁判所は同ブランドの上告受理を見送り、これまで下級審で下されてきた連邦商標登録を認めない判断が事実上確定した。今回の決定は、外国語を英語に直訳して判断する「外国語等価の法理/外国同義語の法理(doctrine of foreign equivalents)」を改めて強く支持するものとなった。

情報源: 米連邦最高裁が Vetements の連邦商標登録を最終否認

続きを読む“商標登録insideNews: Supreme Court Will Not Hear Trademark Case Over Vetements Name | thefashionlaw.com”

商標登録insideNews: Federal trademark law and doctrines of corporate identity | SCOTUSblog

Single corporate entity or not

Single corporate entity or not

In a long-running trademark dispute between two companies marketing real-estate development services, and both using the name Dewberry, a trial court held that Dewberry Group entities infringed the “Dewberry” marks of Dewberry Engineers. The problem is that when the time came for assessing damages,

情報源: Federal trademark law and doctrines of corporate identity – SCOTUSblog

続きを読む“商標登録insideNews: Federal trademark law and doctrines of corporate identity | SCOTUSblog”

商標登録insideNews: US Supreme Court takes up ‘Dewberry’ trademark dispute | Reuters

US SCt takes up Dewberry TM dispute

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday agreed to decide a $43 million dispute between two real estate developers – one in Virginia and one in Georgia – over the rights to the “Dewberry” name in a case exploring when courts can award a company’s profits as a remedy for trademark infringement.

情報源: US Supreme Court takes up ‘Dewberry’ trademark dispute | Reuters

US SCt takes up Dewberry TM dispute

続きを読む“商標登録insideNews: US Supreme Court takes up ‘Dewberry’ trademark dispute | Reuters”

商標登録insideNews: Supreme Court rejects ‘Trump Too Small’ trademark | CNN Politics

SCT rejects Trump Too Small TM

The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a political activist’s attempt to trademark the phrase “Trump Too Small,” saying the federal trademark office did not violate the First Amendment when it declined to register the mark.

情報源: Supreme Court rejects ‘Trump Too Small’ trademark | CNN Politics

SCT rejects Trump Too Small TM

続きを読む“商標登録insideNews: Supreme Court rejects ‘Trump Too Small’ trademark | CNN Politics”

商標登録insideNews: Trademark Infringement is No Joke!: Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC | Ward and Smith, P.A. | JDSupra

SCT favored Jack Daniel over dog toy dispute

Today the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Jack Daniel’s in a dispute over a humorous squeaky dog toy called “Bad Spaniels.” The Court remanded the case to the Ninth Circuit to reconsider the trademark infringement and dilution claims, holding that because VIP Products used “Bad Spaniels” as a trademark: (1) the Rogers test for artistic works (discussed below) does not apply; and (2) the noncommercial use exclusion – that exempts parody from dilution – also does not apply. 

情報源: Trademark Infringement is No Joke!: Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC | Ward and Smith, P.A. – JDSupra

SCT favored Jack Daniel over dog toy dispute

Supreme Court hears trademark case involving Jack Daniel’s and dog toys, 4:38

Supreme Court hears trademark case involving Jack Daniel's and dog toys

続きを読む“商標登録insideNews: Trademark Infringement is No Joke!: Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC | Ward and Smith, P.A. | JDSupra”

商標登録insideNews: Supreme Court will hear attempt to trademark ‘Trump Too Small’ | The Washington Post

US Supreme Court will hear a free speech appeal on trademark “Trump Too Small”

US Supreme Court will hear a free speech appeal

The Supreme Court on Monday said it will consider whether a California attorney has a free-speech right to trademark the phrase “Trump Too Small” for use on T-shirts that mock the former president and build on locker-room taunts from the 2016 Republican presidential primary.

情報源: Supreme Court will hear attempt to trademark ‘Trump Too Small’ – The Washington Post

T-shirt Selling site

A man wants to trademark ‘Trump too small’ for T-shirts. Supreme Court to hear case, 2:56

A man wants to trademark ‘Trump too small’ for T-shirts. Supreme Court to hear case

(2023.6.16追記)

The Supreme Court agreed to review the US Patent & Trademark Office’s (PTO) challenge to a February 2022 ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In the ruling at issue, th

情報源: TRUMP TOO SMALL goes to Supreme Court Trademark Dispute

商標登録insideNews: 「ルイ・ヴィトン」のパロディーブランド訴訟 最高裁へ│WWD JAPAN
商標登録insideNews: Supreme Court: Rejecting trademarks that ‘disparage’ others violates the First Amendment – The Washington Post
商標登録insideNews:「アジア人中傷」バンド名訴訟、米最高裁へ – SankeiBiz(サンケイビズ)

商標登録insideNews: As Supreme Court Case on Extraterritorial Trademark Disputes Heats Up, ABA Asks Justices to Consider 3-Part Test | ipwatchdog.com

Extraterritorial TM Disputes

The American Bar Association (ABA) filed an amicus brief on February 3 with the U.S. Supreme Court asking the Court to clarify issues related to the application of the Lanham Act to trademark disputes that cross international borders.

情報源: As Supreme Court Case on Extraterritorial Trademark Disputes Heats Up, ABA Asks Justices to Consider Three-Part Test

Extraterritorial TM Disputes

続きを読む“商標登録insideNews: As Supreme Court Case on Extraterritorial Trademark Disputes Heats Up, ABA Asks Justices to Consider 3-Part Test | ipwatchdog.com”

商標登録insideNews: Supreme Court to hear Jack Daniel’s trademark case against dog toy company | cnbc.com

US SCt hears Jack Daniel’s toy dispute

Jack Daniel's toy dispute

The Supreme Court agreed Monday to hear a dispute between Jack Daniel’s and a dog toy company that sells “Bad Spaniels” whiskey bottles….. Jack Daniel’s is arguing VIP Products is in violation of federal trademark law and could be confusing shoppers, while VIP Products argues the toy is an “expressive work” under First Amendment protections.

情報源: Supreme Court to hear Jack Daniel’s trademark case against dog toy company

18-16012 VIP Products LLC v. Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc., 26:08

18-16012 VIP Products LLC v. Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc.

商標登録insideNews: Jack Daniel’s takes dog toy to court over trademark infringement

商標登録insideNews: Supreme Court May Review Trademark Territoriality | JDSupra

SCT may review territoriality issue

The United States Supreme Court has a new opportunity to look at whether a U.S. trademark owner can recover damages for infringing uses of the owner’s mark occurring outside the United States. … The district court jury returned a verdict to the tune of $90 million, finding that Abitron had willfully infringed the Hetronic mark— even though 97% of the infringing sales were made in Europe. The district court entered a final judgment in line with the jury’s verdict as well as a worldwide permanent injunction.

情報源: Supreme Court May Review Trademark Territoriality | Miller Nash LLP – JDSupra

US Supreme CourtSCT may review territoriality issue
商標登録insideNews: Recent 2022 Developments Shaping Trademark Law | natlawreview.com
(SCT may review territoriality issue)
Abitron Austria GmbH v. Hetronic International, Inc.