米国特許商標庁 動画
![]()
連邦商標調査の概要
Alo Yoga has pursued cancellation actions against multiple marks it views as too close to its own, including in the EU, but its China challenge against Alo Jewelry’s longer-standing registration has now failed twice. CNIPA rejected Alo Yoga’s appeal against Alo Jewelry’s China trademark, the latest ruling in a multi-jurisdiction dispute over the ALO name…Separate filings cited by Alo Jewelry indicate the dispute has also extended to the European Union, where the Czech company said it filed an application at the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) seeking to invalidate four Alo Yoga trademarks, including the ALO mark, after a series of cancellation actions earlier this year.
Source: Alo Jewelry Alo Yoga China Trademark Ruling 2026 | Sporting Goods Intelligence
![]()
Chinese newcomer Forthing (东风风行) has responded to trademark challenges from German heavyweight Porsche over the name of the brand’s first model in Australian and New Zealand showrooms, the Taikon 5. Porsche AG has filed a trademark opposition concerning the Taikon 5 name in New Zealand, where Forthing was launched in April 2026, and one in Australia. The Australian application to register the Taikon name has attracted two separate oppositions: one from Volkswagen and another from Porsche, of which Volkswagen is the majority shareholder.
Source: Porsche challenges Forthing Taikon 5 trademark | CarExpert

続きを読む“商標登録insideNews: Porsche challenges Forthing Taikon 5 trademark | CarExpert”
![]()
続きを読む“米国特許商標庁 (USPTO) 商標_動画 (embedded) vol.74 How do I file a notice of opposition?”

![]()

続きを読む“フランス国立原産地名称機関(INAO) vol.23 商標_動画(embedded/playlist) five SIQO”
A London High Court ordered Samsung Electronics to pay $11.6 million to Swatch Group for distributing copycat designs of the latter’s products for its smartwatch devices. Swiss-based Swatch Group owns watch brands including Breguet, Blancpain, Omega, Longines and Tissot. The watchmaker had sought about $170 million in damages. It argued against Samsung for permitting the operations of watch-face apps that copied its designs and trademarks through Samsung’s app store.
Source: Samsung ordered to pay $11.6 million in Swatch smartwatch face trademark case
![]()
![]()