タグ: 商標審判部

🆕 商標_最新情報

商標登録insideNews: USPTO announces new filing option available online for Trademark Trial and Appeal Board customers | USPTO

 , ,

TTAB added a new filing option for cancellation

USPTO has announced an added option for Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) customers to file a petition for cancellation in our new system, TTAB Center. The new filing functionality will be available on May 12, 2025. Currently, petitioners can file using either TTAB Center or the existing filing platform, the Electronic System for Trademark Trials and Appeals (ESTTA). Starting on July 12, 2025, users will no longer be able to file petitions for cancellation through ESTTA. A cancellation proceeding is a TTAB proceeding in which a party may seek to cancel an active trademark registration.  

情報源: USPTO announces new filing option available online for Trademark Trial and Appeal Board customers

TTAB added a new filing option for cancellation
TTAB Center of USPTO

続きを読む“商標登録insideNews: USPTO announces new filing option available online for Trademark Trial and Appeal Board customers | USPTO”

🆕 商標_最新情報

商標登録insideNews: Announcing a new filing functionality for Trademark Trial and Appeal Board customers | USPTO

 ,

TTAB launches a beta site for opposition filing

As part of our efforts to modernize our systems and improve customer experience, we’ve launched the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) Center open beta for filing notices of opposition. An opposition is a TTAB proceeding in which a party may challenge the registration of a trademark.  

情報源: Announcing a new filing functionality for Trademark Trial and Appeal Board customers | USPTO

TTAB launches a beta site for opposition filing
TTAB Center Beta

続きを読む“商標登録insideNews: Announcing a new filing functionality for Trademark Trial and Appeal Board customers | USPTO”

🆕 商標_最新情報

商標登録insideNew: Trademark Board Addresses Registration Cancellations During Audit | natlawreview.com–Trigger Rule 2.134?

 , ,

Deletion may result adversely in TTAB cancellation

The Trademark Trial & Appeal Board (Board) addressed, for the first time, whether the deletion of goods and services as a result of a post-registration audit during a cancellation proceeding triggers Trademark Rule 2.134 and found that it does. The Board required the respondent to show cause as to why its deletion of certain goods from the challenged registration should not result in an adverse judgment.

情報源: Trademark Board Addresses Registration Cancellations During Audit Deletion may result adversely in TTAB cancellation

Deletion may result adversely in TTAB cancellation

続きを読む“商標登録insideNew: Trademark Board Addresses Registration Cancellations During Audit | natlawreview.com–Trigger Rule 2.134?”

🆕 商標_最新情報

商標登録insideNews: Luka Doncic fights a trademark control battle with his mother | Basketnews.com

 , ,

Luka Doncic fights Mom’s TM

Luka Doncic is one of the brightest basketball stars in the world. However, the Slovenian superstar is fighting another battle outside the basketball court now. According to NBA journalist Marc Stein, Doncic has filed a petition with the United States Patent and Trademark Office to cancel the registration of the trademark

情報源: Luka Doncic fights a trademark control battle with his mother / News – Basketnews.com

Cancellation (from the record of USPTO)
09/07/2022 INSTITUTED
Number: 92080484

Defendant: Mirjam Poterbin
Registration #: 5953034
Mark: LUKA DONCIC 7

Plaintiff: Luka99, Inc.
Serial #: 90768512
Mark: LUKA DONCIC 7

Serial #: 97349601
Mark: LUKA DONCIC

Serial #: 90790987
Mark: ORIGINAL HOOPS OF LUKA DONCIC

Luka Doncic fights Mom's TM

Best of Luka Doncic: 2022 NBA Playoffs Highlights, 14:49

Best of Luka Doncic: 2022 NBA Playoffs Highlights

Luka Dončić (wikipedia)Luka Doncic fights Mom's TM
商標登録insideNews: Stephen Curry’s Company, SC30inc, Has Reportedly Filed A Trademark For The Phrase “Night Night” – Fadeaway World
(Luka Doncic fights Mom’s TM)

🆕 商標_最新情報

商標登録insideNews: Don’t Dilute My Coca-Cola with Your Concealed Carry | Reason.com

 , ,

No registration for Mr. Conceal Carry, held Administrative Trademark Judge Christopher Larkin of the Trademark Trial & Appeal Board, joined by Judges Linda Kuczma and Thomas Shaw (Coca-Cola Co. v. Hoff); his proposed mark was forbidden by the federal trademark law banning commercial “dilution by blurring” of famous marks:

情報源: Don’t Dilute My Coca-Cola with Your Concealed Carry – Reason.com

Ser. 87822744
Ser. 87822744
US Reg. 73348554
US Reg. 73348554

Coca-Cola Co. v. Hoff

🆕 商標_最新情報

商標登録insideNews: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Considers Supreme Court Ruling on “.com” Trademarks in New Decision | American University Intellectual Property Brief

 , ,

Last week, the U.S. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) rejected arguments by a South Carolina law firm in support of its application for trademark registration of its domain name. The ruling comes not long after the U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion in USPTO v. Booking.com B.V., in which it held that certain terms that would otherwise not qualify for trademark protection can be registered if “.com” is added to the term. However, according to the TTAB, the term at issue now, “onlinetrademarkattorneys.com,” did not meet the requirements for trademark registration despite the addition of “.com.”

情報源: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Considers Supreme Court Ruling on “.com” Trademarks in New Decision – American University Intellectual Property Brief

https://onlinetrademarkattorneys.com/

🆕 商標_最新情報

商標登録insideNews: Wine and Spirit Companies Trademark Alert: Check your Trademarks to Ensure they are not “Deceptive” | Hodgson Russ LLP – JDSupra

 , , ,

The United States Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (the “TTAB”) recently published a precedential decision regarding the treatment of trademarks for wine and spirits and their potential for being “deceptively misdescriptive” pursuant to Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(a). Section 2(a) has three provisions, all of which are relevant to the alcoholic beverage industry. In this new precedential decision, the TTAB held that “[t]erms that are not specifically place names, but which may have ‘geographical association,’ may provide bases for claims under the general deceptiveness provision of Section 2(a).”

情報源: Wine and Spirit Companies Trademark Alert: Check your Trademarks to Ensure they are not “Deceptive” | Hodgson Russ LLP – JDSupra

🆕 商標_最新情報

商標登録insideNews: Twitter Opposes Tweet Bird Food Trademark | lawstreetmedia.com

 , , ,

On Friday, Twitter filed a notice of opposition before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board against applicant Puerto Rican company B. Fernandez & Hnos.’s application for the TWEET mark, asserting that it will be harmed if the applicant’s mark is registered.

情報源: Twitter Opposes Tweet Bird Food Trademark – Tech

Twitter, Inc. v. B. FERNANDEZ& HNOS., 91267749, No. 1 (T.T.A.B. Feb. 19, 2021) (available at https://www.docketalarm.com/cases/TTAB/91267749/Twitter_Inc._v._B._FERNANDEZ&_HNOS/1/)
ESTTA Tracking number: ESTTA1115682