Canadian IP Voices
Canadian IP Voicesはポッドキャストシリーズで、カナダのビジネスの成長と成功を支援するためのヒント、コツ、問題について話し合い、商標、特許、著作権、工業デザイン、企業秘密が実際にどのように機能するかについての全体像を探ります。
タグ: カナダ知的財産庁
カナダ知的財産庁 (CIPO) vol.13 商標_動画(embedded/playlist)
カナダ知的財産庁 (CIPO) 動画
1.IP Talks: Protect your intellectual property、56:03
IP Talks: Protect your intellectual property
IP Talks Session 2: Using intellectual property in business
IP Talks Session 3: Intellectual property funding and support programs
IP Talks Session 4: IP and doing business abroad
IP Talks Session 5: Defending your IP rights
2.Opposition Proceedings Concerning Madrid Protocol Applications, 1:00:28
Opposition Proceedings Concerning Madrid Protocol Applications
カナダ知的財産庁 (CIPO) vol.12 商標_動画(embedded)
1. Webinar: Updated TMOB Electronic Services, 56:36
Webinar: Updated TMOB Electronic Services
TMOBはTrademarks Opposition Board（商標異議審判部）の略称で、Opposition（異議申立） and Section 45（不使用取消）の手続を取り扱います。カナダ商標法第４５条では、商標権者が第４５条の告知の日付より前の３年間にカナダで商標の使用を示すことができない場合、商標登録の削除（抹消）を要求することができます。
商標登録insideNews: Intellectual property office tackles pending trademark application backlog | The Lawyer’s Daily
On May 3, 2021, the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) published two new Practice Notices aiming to address its unexamined application backlog. There is currently a significant examination backlog consisting of over 161,000 applications having filing dates stretching back to April of 2018. CIPO is receiving new applications at the rate of about 6,000 applications per month, but is only issuing about 4,000 examination reports per month. It is critical to address the backlog to avert a total collapse of the Canadian trademark system.
情報源: Intellectual property office tackles pending trademark application backlog – The Lawyer’s Daily
カナダ知的財産庁 (CIPO) vol.11 商標_動画(embedded/playlist)
Intellectual property protection abroad
カナダ知的財産庁(CIPO)のビデオシリーズ「海外の知的財産保護」の５つの動画を紹介。
商標登録insideNews: Be prepared: Fees for some of our services will increase on January 1, 2021 | Canadian Intellectual Property Office
January 1, 2021 fee adjustment: On January 1, 2021, the fees for the services outlined below will increase by 2%, in accordance with the Service Fees Act. Note that not all fees are subject to the annual adjustment.
情報源: Fees for trademarks – Canadian Intellectual Property Office
Application for the registration of a trademark;
Statement of opposition;
Application to extend the statement of goods or services;
Request for the giving of one or more notices under subsections 44(1) or 45(1) of the Trademarks Act;
Renewal of a registered trademark;
Issuance of a certificate of registration under item 15 of the Tariff of Fees of the former Trade‑marks Regulations;
Trademark agent qualifying examination;
Request for a name to be entered, maintained or reinstated on the list of trademark agents.
カナダ知的財産庁 (CIPO) vol.10 商標_動画(embedded/playlist)
Intellectual Property Strategy
6 steps to your intellectual property strategy
How to identify your intellectual property
How to do an external intellectual property audit
How to identify intellectual property opportunities
Create a plan for how to use your intellectual property
How to implement your intellectual property strategy
How to adjust your intellectual property strategy
カナダ知的財産庁 (CIPO) vol.9 商標_動画(embedded)
Stories of IP
Function, Form and Intellectual Property With Karim Rashid
商標登録insideNew: New initiative – Trademark amendments without an examiner’s report | Canadian Intellectual Property Office
Effective on May 20, 2020, we are starting a new initiative. You or your appointed agent might get a call from a trademark examiner asking for:Verbal permission to amend your application. A trademark examiner might call to ask for verbal permission to:add missing disclaimers related to the use of a trademarked colour system or the 11-point maple leaf. An electronic revised trademark application. A trademark examiner might call to ask you to send an amended trademark application, if:a registration symbol (example: “TM” or “MC”) needs to be removedtypographical errors need to be correctedthe entire mark is disclaimedpriority claims are not properly linked to an amended statement of goods and servicesthe statement of goods and services is improperly separated by punctuation (example: a displaced semicolon)the Nice Classification is incorrecta colour claim is incomplete