タイ知的財産庁 動画
An Introduction to Department of Intellectual Property, 4:48 
An Introduction to Department of Intellectual Property
世界知的所有権機関(WIPO) vol.78 商標_動画 (embedded)
世界知的所有権機関 動画
1.CLIP: The Online Platform Where Creators Learn Intellectual Property, 1:18
CLIP: The Online Platform Where Creators Learn Intellectual Property
商標登録insideNews: Arkansas State wins trademark dispute with Chattanooga soccer team over Red Wolves name and logo | KATV
Arkansas State wins over Red Wolves name and logo in TTAB proceeding
A dispute between Arkansas State University and a Chattanooga-based United Soccer League team centered around the similarity of their Red Wolves branding…The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ruling deemed that the Chattanooga Red Wolves’ logo was too similar to ASU’s.
USPTO TTAB Opposition Number: 91253165
アルゼンチン国立産業財産権機関（INPI Argentina) vol.10 商標_動画（embedded）
アルゼンチン国立産業財産権機関 動画
1. INPI Argentina – Taller virtual de Transferencia de derechos de las áreas sustantivas, 1:15:56
INPI Argentina - Taller virtual de Transferencia de derechos de las áreas sustantivas
続きを読む“アルゼンチン国立産業財産権機関（INPI Argentina) vol.10 商標_動画（embedded）”
商標登録insideNews: 香港のショッピングサイトで…鳥取県章「激似」マーク無断使用 鳥取県が商標登録出願、警告文書 応じない場合は訴訟も辞さず | TBS NEWS DIG
鳥取県章 激似マーク 無断使用
中国・香港のショッピングサイトで、鳥取県の県章とほぼ同じマークが無断で使われている問題。県は県章の商標登録を出願したことを明らかにしました。今後、相手企業に対し使用中止を求める警告文書を送るなどの対応を進めていきます。
情報源: 香港のショッピングサイトで…鳥取県章「激似」マーク無断使用 鳥取県が商標登録出願、警告文書 応じない場合は訴訟も辞さず | TBS NEWS DIG
鳥取県章にそっくり！香港のショッピングサイトで類似マークが無断で使われていた, 1:35
鳥取県章にそっくり！香港のショッピングサイトで類似マークが無断で使われていた
鳥取 地域ブランド・商標登録 全国ご当地名産品 vol.31
An issue where a mark almost identical to the prefectural emblem of Tottori Prefecture is being used without permission on a shopping site in Hong Kong, China. The prefecture has announced that it has applied to register the prefectural emblem as a trademark.
クロアチア共和国国家知的財産庁(dzivHR) 商標_動画(embedded) vol.3
クロアチア共和国国家知的財産庁 動画
1.Tutorijal – Produljenje registracije žiga, 8:12
Tutorijal - Produljenje registracije žiga
商標登録insideNews: Blackpink Jennie files trademark application as fans wonder if she is eyeing a solo career | dailyo.in
Blackpink Jennie files TM applications
Jennie, a prominent member of the famed K-Pop group Blackpink, has stirred speculation by seeking a trademark. While such business moves are routine for celebrities, this action has ignited questions about the likelihood of her pursuing a solo career amid recent developments within the group. On November 14, it came to light through the KIPRIS (Korea Intellectual Property Rights Info Service) that Jennie Kim applied for 10 trademarks under the name “Jennie Ruby Jane,” initially filing in January this year.
情報源: Blackpink Jennie files trademark application as fans wonder if she is eyeing a solo career
JENNIE – ‘SOLO’ M/V, 2:56
JENNIE - 'SOLO' M/V
商標登録insideNews: t-araのニュース – “T-ARA”を商標登録出願…「BEASTの時とは違う」 – 楽天WOMAN
セルビア知的財産庁 商標_動画（embedded）vol.2
セルビア知的財産庁 動画
1.Obeležavanje 103. godišnjice Zavoda za intelektualnu svojinu – snimak događaja, 1:19:21
Obeležavanje 103. godišnjice Zavoda za intelektualnu svojinu - snimak događaja
商標登録insideNews: Bloom Fresh wins Korean trademark case | Fruitnet
Sweet Sapphire is a trademark not generic variety in Korea
Korean Intellectual Property High Court rules Sweet Sapphire is a trademark not generic variety Leading fruit breeder Bloom Fresh – created by the merger of IFG and SNFL – has announced a Korean Intellectual Property High Court has ruled in its favour in a trademark case relating toand Black Sapphire
情報源: Bloom Fresh wins Korean trademark case | Article | Fruitnet
続きを読む“商標登録insideNews: Bloom Fresh wins Korean trademark case | Fruitnet”
商標登録insideNews: Hungry Jack’s Big Jack ‘not deceptively similar’ to McDonald’s Big Mac in burger case, court finds | ABC News
Big Jack is not deceptively similar to Big Mac
McDonald’s has lost its legal dispute with fast-food rival Hungry Jack’s over its Big Mac lookalike burger the “Big Jack”. The American giant had claimed that consumers would confuse the Big Jack with the Big Mac and this would eat into McDonald’s profits.
“The judge ruled that ‘the purpose was not to mislead, but to invite a comparison and contrast’, between the two products and brands.(裁判官は、２つの製品とブランドの間で「誤解を招くことが目的ではなく、比較と対照を促すことが目的だった」との判決を下した。)”
New Big Jack & Mega Jack | Hungry Jack’s, 0:15
New Big Jack & Mega Jack | Hungry Jack's
